top of page

When a Mistake Feels Like a Verdict

3 days ago
4 min read

My previous post was about exhaustion – the kind that rest doesn't touch. This one is about something that tends to show up right alongside it, often getting loudest exactly when capacity is at its lowest: a harsh internal voice, delivering a verdict that's usually far more severe than whatever actually happened.


You might recognise a version of this: you send an email with a typo in the subject line to a client, and your first thought is I'm a mess. I can't even get the basics right anymore.

 A subject line. One typo.


Or it's forgetting to reply to a text for two days and deciding this proves you're a bad friend. Or mispronouncing a word in a meeting and spending the next ten minutes convinced everyone noticed and judged you for it.


For many women, the word that comes to mind here is failing – and what's striking is how disproportionate it usually is.

Not “I made a mistake.” Not even “I'm having a hard week.” I'm failing. A verdict handed down on the whole, because of a small, ordinary part.


The Standard You're Failing Isn't Even a Real One

Here's a question worth asking before anything else: failing, compared to what?


Often, the standard being missed isn't as reasonable as it feels. It's built from years of over-performance that got praised precisely because it looked effortless.


I've written previously about being praised for years for something that was quietly costing far more effort than anyone watching ever knew. This is where that praise turns into a trap. Once a very high, very effortful standard has been consistently met, it stops looking like an achievement and starts looking like a baseline – the bare minimum, rather than the unusually demanding thing it actually was.


And once something becomes the baseline in your own mind, falling even slightly short of it doesn't feel like a small miss. It feels like collapse.

For some women with ADHD, that baseline can become even more distorted, because the standard was frequently built to compensate – to prove, to yourself as much as anyone, that you weren't the disorganised or unreliable person you'd feared you might be seen as. That standard was never just “do the task well.” It was “do the task well enough that no one ever suspects the effort it took” – which is a genuinely brutal bar to hold yourself to indefinitely.


That Voice Used to Have a Job

The harsh voice itself is worth looking at directly. For many women, being hard on yourself first may have functioned for years as a kind of protection – pre-empting criticism by delivering it yourself, faster and harsher, so nothing external could really land.


It might look like rehearsing an apology for a mistake before anyone else had even noticed it as a mistake. Or getting ahead of a criticism that, it turned out, nobody was actually about to make. Or replaying a five-minute conversation from Tuesday on Thursday night, searching for the moment you said the wrong thing.


This isn't a flaw in your character. It's a coping strategy that made sense once, given what it was responding to, and that never quite got the memo to stand down.

If you have ADHD, this voice can also carry extra history – a childhood or young adulthood that may have included criticism for things that weren't really about effort or care: being told you were lazy, careless, or not trying hard enough, when the truth was closer to a brain working differently than the systems built around it expected.


Some people with ADHD also experience particularly strong emotional responses to perceived criticism or rejection. You may have come across the term rejection sensitive dysphoria for this, although it isn't a formal diagnosis or consistently defined in clinical research. More broadly, emotional dysregulation is well recognised in ADHD, even though it isn't part of the core diagnostic criteria.


Whatever language you use for it, the experience can be very real: a small mistake or ambiguous response can trigger a much bigger wave of shame, hurt or self-criticism than the situation itself seems to warrant.


The self-critical voice, in that context, isn't coming from nowhere. It's often repeating, in your own voice now, things that were said to you, or implied about you, a long time ago.


When the Old Standard Stops Fitting

As hormonal changes during perimenopause can affect cognition, attention and emotional regulation – a pattern this whole series keeps returning to – the gap between the old standard and your current capacity can widen.


The self-critical voice, calibrated years ago to a much higher baseline, doesn't recalibrate on its own just because your circumstances have changed.


It keeps measuring you against a version of yourself that may no longer exist in quite the same way, and may never have been sustainable indefinitely regardless.

The voice isn't more accurate right now. It's just measuring against an old, unadjusted measuring stick.


The Best Friend Test

Here's a small, honest exercise worth sitting with rather than rushing past: picture your close friend in your exact position – same mistake, same week, same exhaustion behind it.


What would you say to your friend?


Most women, asked this directly, answer with something notably gentler and more accurate than what they've been saying to themselves.

“You've had a brutal week, of course you missed that” rather than “I can't get the basics right anymore.” That gap is worth noticing. It isn't evidence that you're being too soft on her. It's evidence of how much harsher, and how much less accurate, the voice aimed at yourself has been allowed to become.


A question for you: if you spoke to yourself the way you'd speak to your closest friend this week, what's the first thing that would change?


 

 
 
bottom of page